Time after time, they've committed basketball malpractice. I already mentioned taking Bagley over Doncic. Last off-season, the incompetence was on full display when they botched the sign-and-trade that would have sent Bogdan Bogdanović to the Milwaukee Bucks. The deal fell through after a leak revealed the Kings were not yet authorized to make the transaction, causing both Bogdanovic and the Bucks to feel double-crossed. That led to Bogdanoic balling out for the Atlanta Hawks and the Kings getting nothing in return. If the Kings fail to make the playoffs again for the 15th year in a row, it's pretty safe to assume that Luke Walton gets fired. Would De'Aaron Fox really want to go through another head coach?
However, if I'm the Kings . . . is De'Aaron Fox worth keeping long term? It's a difficult question to answer.
On one hand, talent like his doesn't come along often to Sacramento. On the other hand, are we sure he's good enough to be a top-3 player on a finals team? If not, what's the point of paying him $163 million over the next five years when you can trade him for a more proven star player? As of right now, players like Damian Lillard, Ben Simmons, and Bradley Beal are on the trade bubble to varying degrees. With the way the NBA is going, who knows which players might be available down the line around the trade deadline or the start of the next off-season. The backcourt of Haliburton and Mitchell on paper has the potential to be special, and if it does pan out, that makes Fox even more expandable.
How good Fox is, depends on who you ask.